Talk:Scott Ginsburg
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
[edit]I thought I would try editing a post that appears to be questionable - since it has a red block questioning the entry. I deleted information that sounded non-factual or too marketing. I did not delete anything that appeared to have links supporting the information listed. Luv2Fly (talk) 22:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Luv2Fly
Since I have this page on my watch list, I've continued to edit it since there was still some question about it needing verification. I've searched and found more articles about the content of the page. Luv2Fly (talk) 15:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Luv2Fly
I'm sorry, I deleted the notes from Wiki before reading the page notes. I was in the process of editing it and adding citations. Got a little delete happy. Luv2Fly (talk) 19:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Luv2Fly