Talk:Scotobiology
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Text which is described in the OTRS ticket. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under the GNU Free Documentation License. Because this permission was received prior to 1 November 2008, you may use the material under either that license or the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2007011710016375. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
.
PermissionOTRS
[edit]This permission only speaks to the text copyright and not to the quality of the article or the notability of its subject. Bastiq▼e demandez 19:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
delete
[edit]please may this be deleted Eugene-elgato (talk) 20:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Restored to last good revision ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 22:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you; sorry I hadn't noticed it had been legitimate previously. Eugene-elgato (talk) 22:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
re-organizing page
[edit]I saw the toolong tag on this page, which indicated that it was too long and should be split. The article is actually not that long, but i am assuming (in good faith) that someone thought it was a bit dense and unreadable. While the wording remains the same, I organized into sections, and re-arranged them to make more sense. Hopefully the article is a bit more readable. With indugence i have removed the toolong tag. I considered removing the nofootnotes tag as well, as almost all of the footnotes are inline with the text, but need to read more of the history of the article first. (although any time a tag is added to an article, there should be a corresponding note on the talk page, right?). I invite anyone else to deal with adding references and citations as needed to continue cleanup on this page. Nothingofwater (talk) 18:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)