Talk:Scifaiku

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citation needed

I am trying to figure out the intent of the tag in the paragraph discussing the first published scifaiku. Since the example does in fact its source, is it that the claim that this is "first" is under question? And how would one substantiate this statement anyway except for demonstrating that no other science fiction publication prior to 1962 had a haiku-like poem? That is one of those "proving a negative" chores which are so tricky. Milkfish 02:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad link

Looks like the Periodic Table of Haiku has been replaced by a spammy links site. Shdamberger (talk) 05:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it to the most recent version on archive.org that had working (non-Javascript) links. Milkfish (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scifaiku. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110818005400/http://hooks-and-books.livejournal.com/4153.html to http://hooks-and-books.livejournal.com/4153.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]