Talk:Sciences Po Law School
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sciences Po Law School article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Neutrality, relevance and accuracy
[edit]Most of the article were not related to the law school in itself, but to the law in Sciences Po before this "school" ever existed.
Besides, many statements were only personal opinions presented as general truths.
--Delfield (talk) 16:43, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
AFD
[edit]@Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrusscope_creeptalkCoolabahappleJack N. Stock Following the AfD, some of you were in favor in merging but some of you thought AfD was not the right place for that. How should we proceed now?
I am in favor of merging. --Delfield (talk) 10:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Delfield: There is no consensus for a merge. The Afd was explicit and result of the argument was a keep. scope_creepTalk 12:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- although my only involvement with this afd was to add it to some afd lists, i agree with scope_creep above that consensus and the outcome of the afd was to keep the article, so it is to remain as a standalone article. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed, between keep or delete, the result was to keep. It is why I am creating a discussion here, as you proposed and as Jack N. Stock implied should be done instead of the AfD. --Delfield (talk) 20:15, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- although my only involvement with this afd was to add it to some afd lists, i agree with scope_creep above that consensus and the outcome of the afd was to keep the article, so it is to remain as a standalone article. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Delfield: There is no consensus for a merge. The Afd was explicit and result of the argument was a keep. scope_creepTalk 12:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Merging
[edit]- I support merging to the parent school, as a department doesn't seem notable on its own. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus: could you put your vote in bold? --Delfield (talk) 11:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose merge because notability arises because of the controversy surrounding the modern creation of the law school, well-covered in independent sources, satisfying WP:N. Klbrain (talk) 06:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Klbrain: the school was created in 2009. In the long history section, literally one sentence, without any source, is really about the law school (the first of the last paragraph). The rest is related the Sciences Po and the law in general and it is copy pasted from the whole institute's page. --Delfield (talk) 11:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Am I allowed to vote? --Delfield (talk) 11:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)