Talk:Science and Development Network
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wouldn't have this was a speedy. Would have thought it a AFD. --OscarTheCattalk
19:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
commercial v npo ads?
[edit]Given SciDev.Net is not a commercial organisation, has no commercial interests, doesn't have anything to sell (even web subscriptions) and is mostly funded by charitable and public sector organisations, I think it's a bit harsh to call its article an advert.
After all, Wikipedia has entries for Oxfam, Science and Nature. Only one of those is an npo, and all of them have products to sell.
But I'd agree that the language of this article needs to be changed to make it NPOV. Anyone with good editing skills want to have a go?
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Science and Development Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080313024911/http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-1-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html to http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-1-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)