Talk:SciELO

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Science Taskforce (assessed as Low-importance).

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Databases (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Brazil: Arts / Education and science Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Arts in Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Education and Science in Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Open Access High‑importance

SciELO is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Open Access to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Creative Commons licensing (to replace Creative Commons license); Creative Commons Attribution License (currently a redirect), reproducible research (currently a redirect), supplementary material. Scholarly Open Access (currently a redirect)
Cleanup : Access2Research
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stub-Class Open access articles.
Other : add {{WikiProject Open Access}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess;
- Check media files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer for missing or incomplete categorization or lack of descriptions, or put the files into suitable Wikipedia articles. See also recent uploads of open-access files more generally.

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

List of journals

The list of journals seems quite old. Now SciELO has 638 journals (today), so I guess it doesn't make any sense to list all of them here. I would rather enter some text about the project itself.

Sergioruizperez (talk) 08:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check perfomance of this article

In January 2014 statistics of this article's traffic the average was less tham 20 pageviews/day. After editing, and adding of links in related articles, in February and March 2014, the statistics increased:

more than 30 pageviews/day in March and April 2014
more than 40 pageviews/day in June and September 2015

Please, check the lasted 90 days average here to check the growing... And do more links (from other articles or from external sites) to this article! The traffic can grow!

--Krauss (talk) 16:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Take off J. Beall propaganda

Please remove the section "Controversy": at this time there are no real controversy, the section is used to ideologic and self-promoting of J. Beall. There was a (personal) fake-news and a great disregard for the scientific community in Latin America. Preserving the memory of this fake-news at Wikipedia is a way to preserve better detractor's statistics. --Krauss (talk) 19:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please elaborate on which policy was violated by that section. Otherwise please do not censor content. -Mys_721tx (talk) 18:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Beall is one of the top librarian and the world's foremost expert on predatory publishing. If he has something to say about something in the world of publishing, Wikipedia cannot ignore it. Invoking Trumpian logic that things that are unflattering to you amounts to fake news will not sway anyone. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]