Talk:Schiehallion experiment

Schiehallion experiment has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 6, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 3, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 1774 Schiehallion experiment to calculate the density of the Earth also made the first use of contour lines to represent height?

‹See TfM›

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Schiehallion experiment is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science High‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology rating

A well-written article; a pleasure to read.

Interesting that this had been rated high in importance by WP:Scotland & WP:Physics, but unrated by WP:Geology until today. I’ll take the liberty of rating it for WP:Geology, as mid, on the basis that:

Following the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geology/Assessment#Importance_scale to qualify as high it would have to cover a general area of knowledge. This is not a general area of knowledge; the general area would be something like techniques for measuring gravity.

However it is an important development which filled in a very significant specific knowledge area – how the gravitational attraction resulting from large masses of earth was initially detected. It served as the basis for the science which subsequently developed to measure the density of the planets & detection of mascons.

An argument could be made that the importance of this article is “low” – the argument would go that this is an interesting piece of historical trivia that is only useful in instructing beginning students by providing them the insight that gravitation can be measured & giving them an example of the scientific method in practice. However pivotal discoveries & turning points in scientific understanding are arguably noteworthy.

As always on Wikipedia, comments are welcomed if you think I got this wrong.

Skål - User:Williamborg 17:04, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BAsic Physics.

The experiment will find the mean density of the Earth. The basic theory relies on the fact that a sphere of any density distribution can be replaced by a point mass at the centre, of the same total mass. The only requirement is that the density distribution is a function only of the distance from the centre of the sphere; it must be symmetric. (This is true for any inverse-square law.) A nearby mass not lying inside the perfect sphere, or gaussian surface, can be considered as a mass separate to the Earth. The idea of replacement by a point mass was known by the early 1700s ... Leonard Euler I suspect.220.245.41.207 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Earth Curvature

The experiment assumes a round Earth, and takes into account Earth's curvature. Would it have had a null result if assuming a flat Earth? 115.179.83.12 (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The gravitational effects would be unchanged but the correction made for the difference in latitude between the north and south observatories would have led to a false result. —BillC ^talk 13:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Intro

The second (final) paragraph of the introduction of this article is written like a teaser. The introduction should instead summarize the findings of the experiment. Jess_Riedel (talk) 15:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology problems

The "Repeat experiment" section says that "his result would not be significantly improved upon until 1895 by Charles Boys.[c]"

However, note c says that "his measurements actually led to a value of 5,448 kg·m−3; a discrepancy that was not found until 1821 by Francis Baily."

We need a source to clarify when Baily noticed the error. It was probably 1921, not 1821. Mateussf (talk) 23:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]