Jump to content

Talk:Scelidotheriidae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 28 September 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 04:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


ScelidotheriidaeScelidotheriinae – Scelidotheriidae is misspelled Lmalena 19:07, 28 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. UtherSRG (talk) 01:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Presslee et al. 2019 spells it as "Scelidotheriidae" (as a family, not a subfamily.) Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not a misspelling. The article also cites Nieto et al. 2020, which has Scelidotherium in Mylodontidae in the title (which implies Scelidotheriinae is a subfamily), but calls Scelidotheriinae a family (not subfamily) in the abstract (I haven't found full text of Nieto). Perhaps there studies post-Presslee arguing for subfamily status, but the inconsistency in the Nieto abstract makes it a poor source, and I suspect family vs. subfamily isn't really something that Nieto addresses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plantdrew (talkcontribs) 16:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Changes to taxonomy articles are done by following the secondary sources, not the primary research papers. This helps to ensure that the change is one that is accepted by a significant portion of the scientific community. Also, I'm going to relist this so that appropriate WikiProject(s) can be notified. UtherSRG (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Mammals has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Palaeontology has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment: Relisted to provide time for Project members UtherSRG (talk) 01:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment "Misspelling" is obviously a bogus reason. idae/inae indicates family/subfamily status respectively. Having had a look on scholar, the usage of "inae" seems more prevalent in literature over the last several years, but it doesn't seem hugely pressing to change it, given the current in-flux state of sloth taxonomy. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose given untenable rationale and Hemiauchenia's comment. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 01:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.