Talk:Scanner Access Now Easy

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 April 2014. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn.

Back-ends list

Do we really need a list of supported backends? How about we summarize the results, e.g. "SANE supports all scanners on the market except for those from Acme"... 128.158.145.51 18:26, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The list of supported back-ends was overwhelming the article. I just removed the list, but I'll support something more concise like "SANE supports X scanner models from Y number of manufacturers". — EagleOne\^Talk 17:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

If you use SANE, please feel free to put this userbox on your user page!

Code

Result

|{{User:Ahunt/Sane}}

This user scans with SANE.

Usage

- Ahunt (talk) 22:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Windows port?

The infobox states that SANE is available for Windows, but it's not stated anywhere on the official site nor any builds available for download. Some searching reveals few porting attempts in starting state, none of them useable. If author(s) know of working Win32 SANE implementation, they could add a link, otherwise Windows should be removed from Operating systems line as misleading. 78.37.253.194 (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found it at XSANE Win32 - Ahunt (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not WIN32 compatible SANE-backend. "It is not possible to use scanners that are connected to the local windows machine with the network version!"XSANE Win32. Please, remove Windows availability and do not confuse people anymore! 95.161.2.222 (talk) 15:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)freasbe.[reply]

Fixed - have a look and see what you think. - Ahunt (talk) 16:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I found some messages about possibility of building sane-backends on windows host using Cygwin. It seems that not many people have tested it, but "README.windows" included in sane-backends distribution states that it works but with some constraints:"Only SCSI and USB (with libusb-win32) scanners may work. No FireWire/Parallel. The Cygwin libusb port is at http://sourceforge.net/projects/libusb-win32. Tested on Windows 2000 only. Should work on Windows NT/XP too; may or may not work on Windows 95/98/ME. Some scanners' backend may not work because of requirement not supported by Cygwin." (from package 1.0.21 ) Currently I'm involved into project that needs a scanner to work both on Linux and Windows platforms. So if sane-backends compiles and works well on Windows, I will report here to correct my mistake.95.161.2.222 (talk) 19:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)freasbe[reply]

Well I think the article is correct for now. If that does turn out to be possible we'll need a reference to cite! - Ahunt (talk) 19:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]