Talk:Scanian dialect/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

As I noted ten days earlier,

1. Scanian dialects are likely to have an inner taxonomy the is not dealt with in the article.

2. The presentation of sounds is VERY short, doesn't go into details and doesn't give examples. Given that this kind of data is usually very readily available, this might be a reason for demotion.

3. There is no info on morphology or syntax whatsoever.

4. A subset of the information doesn't have in-line references, eg sounds.

This looks like good reasons for demoting this article from GA status. If someone is willing to address these concerns, I might try to find some other points of relevance that might have to be addressed, but for the time being this should suffice. G Purevdorj (talk) 22:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you just go ahead and demote it if you don't think it's up to the standards, since it's been well over a week. It is shockingly poor on certain linguistic aspects. The main creator of the article, User:Pia L, doesn't seem to be very active these days (one edit since October). Lampman (talk) 18:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just realised that what you wrote on 1 June was not an actual GAR. So I suppose you should wait till Tuesday then, though it seems unlikely that anything will happen. Lampman (talk) 18:18, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you were right, nothing happened. So I'll delist.