Talk:Scandinavian Mountains

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Mid‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains High‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finland Low‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name of the Mountain Range

Is this really the English name for these mountains? I've never ever seen anything else than Kjølen been used in Norway. Fornadan (t) 23:49, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Try Googling - lots of scholarly books and papers use it for instance. Stan 00:04, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In Norway the name Kjølen refers to the watershed between Norway and Sweden (and the mountains consisting of it). The mountain Galdhøpiggen lies far west of this watershed, and I don't think anyone in Norway would say it is a part of Kjølen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.215.44.157 (talk) 09:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kölen is rather old-fashioned in Swedish too. I have never heard anyone saying "We're off to the middle Keel for the holidays" - it's not really used in speech, nor by STF (the Swedish Tourism Association), weather forecasters, news media or SJ, the public railways company which takes hundreds of thousands of Swedish and foreign tourists up there every year - it's really only found in (older) books. Everyone says fjällen. /Strausszek (talk) 11:19, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

English literary and historical references are to "the Keel", but as noted above referring only to the range forming the Swedish-Norwegian boundary, and not to Dovrefjell/Jotunheimen/Hardangervidda/Haukelifjell. I wound up here after seeing this name on the Jotunheimen article and, not having seen the name before, came to see what reference it has; it has none, apparently. And in local perspective it's not a single range, obviously (since there's no collective name for it and despite its common orogeny). My immediate reaction to this is that this page should not be titled as it is, but instead should be Mountains of Scandinavia and/or [[Mountain ranges of Scandinavia]. It is not one range, and does not have a common name, referenced or otherwise, so should not be titled and treated as though it did.Skookum1 (talk) 03:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The name of this mountain range in English is actually highly problematic. In the 1890 Encyclopedia Britannica, for instance, these mountains are referred to as the "Scandinavian Alps." The term "Scandes," which is currently indicated in the main article as a common or accepted name for the range, is neither common nor commonly accepted. It would seem appropriate for the main article to mention the remarkable fact that such a large range has no single, consistently used, historical English name. Jessdave (talk) 00:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Age of the mountain chain

The Caledonian orogeny was 400 million years ago. These mountains were eroded away with normal speed, and the Scandinavian Peninsula was a plain during the Mesozoic, partly flooded by the ocean. The Scandinavian Mountains of today were formed in Paleogene and Neogene. However, they do contain rocks from The Caledonian orogeny, but also much older rock. Trurl1 (talk) 21:20, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Scandinavian Mountains/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

An article without any references/source is always a stub no matter how long the article may currently be. If there were sources, I would rate it "Start" class. RedWolf (talk) 05:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 05:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 05:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Area

No information about the surface of the Scandinavian Mountains. WorldCitizen333 (talk) 11:49, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Caledonides EN.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Old or young?

This sentence should presumable be changed I guess? "The mountains are relatively high for a range so young and are very steep in places". Mountains tend to wear down over time so this should be "so old" right? 94.255.243.101 (talk) 14:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]