Talk:Saxa

Untitled

Will someone please explain why Saxa is unencylopedic? I'm not saying whether it is or isn't, however no reason has been given as to why it is unencylopedic. Salinae 23:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't work that way. We need to find references establishing that the subject of the article is encyclopedic according to the WP:N and WP:V guidelines. If you feel that the subject meets those criteria, then remove the deletion notice from the article. —Psychonaut 23:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the deletion notice since in my opinion Saxa salt satisifes WP:N since: it is the subject of a Hornby railway carriage; it's livery is used on a full size wagon; and it's mentioned in A short history of British Television Advertising by the National Media Museum. Note that although the Hornby wagon and the real wagon carry SAXA advertising, they are not produced by RHM so they are independent.Salinae 22:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saxa Salt: Moved page by copy/paste

Being amateur at wikipedia I moved the original Saxa page copy/paste rather than with the convenient "move" feature tab. So, to follow through I'm copy pasting this discussion as well. - Steve3849 ^talk 17:06, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]