Talk:Saw (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Darkwarriorblake (talk · contribs) 14:30, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

• Very minor prose issue such as "The script was optioned by a producer in Sydney for year but". Assuming it is missing an a between "for" and "year" in funding section.
• "(who soon after formed Twisted Pictures)." Soon after what? Before the film was finished or picked up?
• Remove wikilink to 'photographer', 'shotgun', and 'poison' in plot as obvious terms.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold while prose issues are dealt with. Also won't affect it passing but maybe consider adding an image or more to the cast section just to balance it out a little aesthetically, looks a little awkward as some cast have detailed info and others do not. An image of Bell or Smith would probably look good there but either way, this won't affect it passing.

I've taken care of the issues, take a look. Thanks. —Mike Allen 00:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)