Talk:Saving Private Ryan/GA2

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I tagged a couple of things that were missing cites, but I have no doubt as to their accuracy or that they can be cited in due course.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

   Archiving the talk page so severely may have been appropriate, but I had to go through the article history to reassure myself that you weren't trying to hide anything.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   There's certainly room for screenshots from the movie.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Identified issues aren't sufficient to hold back from GA status. Please address them, of course. Jclemens (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)