Talk:Savile Town

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Savile Town is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is biased in favor of muslims. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christusrex (talk • contribs) 21:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's because Savile Town is a Muslim town - 97% at the last count. Epa101 (talk) 09:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some factual information, yet I have done so using the Daily Mail as a source. In spite of its truth, the Daily Mail is regarded as right wing, and therefore, it is not considered factual. Moreover, my addition will probably be undone by my social justice warrior troll Pinkbeast, an anti-British racist, but the facts remain true. Time shall tell. Twistedpiper (talk) 04:00, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No suprise that the above user was banned for his comment. It's disgraceful, as his edit included factual information that would have been useful to the page - but this was quickly reverted as it did not suit Wikipedia's bias.79.66.72.205 (talk) 14:14, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that individuals such as Aswinpai are attempting to replace the image of the historic Savile Town water fountain with the Markazi Masjid mosque. This is unfitting of the article header image and requires a separate section if necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrEarlGray (talk • contribs) 08:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am restoring the image based on there being many articles on places in England where the lead or infobox image is of the local place of worship - thee is no reason why it should be "unfitting" in this case. The mosque is covered in the main text, it is one of several in the area so seems to be an appropriate representation of the topic, whereas there is no mention in the article of the significance of the fountain. EdwardUK (talk) 10:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Needed: Is it really historical demand for foreign factory labour that is responsible for the disproportionate ethnic make up of the area? I would suggest that mass immigration under the Blair and subsequent governments is a far more likely cause. Until we compile census data and check how far back this demographic imbalance goes, I am adding a citation needed tag to the assertion. 51.194.219.0 (talk) 20:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suicide bombers

@MrEarlGray: The spectator says Dewsbury ... Three of the four savages who carried out the July 2005 bombings in London came from the area not that they came from Savile town. The Guardian states This West Yorkshire town was also home to Mohammad Sidique Khan, the leader of the 7/7 attacks on London in July 2005 nothing about any others. This area is part of Dewsbury, not the other way around. Do you realise that the information on Hamaad Munshi and Talha Asmal was never removed and thus it is now duplicated by your edit? SmartSE (talk) 14:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Do you realise that the information on Hamaad Munshi and Talha Asmal was never removed and thus it is now duplicated by your edit?" We all make minor mistakes. If you see them, be a good-natured fellow and fix them. MrEarlGray (talk) 00:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MrEarlGray: Ok, but how many times do I have to tell you that there is no source to support Savile Town has been reported to have produced the highest number of Islamist extremists in the United Kingdom, including three of the four suicide bombers who carried out the 7 July 2005 London bombings which you have now replaced three times? SmartSE (talk) 16:46, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sources state exactly what is written. Please refrain from engaging in an edit war and removing sources. MrEarlGray (talk) 18:08, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MrEarlGray: So which source supports "three of the four suicide bombers" then? And likewise which source says "used eyewitness accounts to suggest that in the eyes of residents, the area does not feel safe" SmartSE (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]