Talk:Savić Marković Štedimlija
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Savić Marković Štedimlija article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Wanderer, Montenegro wasn't independent really at all. It was a puppet-state under Italian control and then German occupation (whereas most of the territory was even not held by the occupiers, but the Chetniks throughout most of the war). --PaxEquilibrium 21:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I suppose you're right. I was trying to convey that it was more independent than in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, when it didn't officially exist at all, but you're explanation is better ;). --Thewanderer 22:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- How am I doing writing the article so far? Please help over 'ere to write a NPOV article. --PaxEquilibrium 22:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Critika1
[edit]It has nothing to do with me, but then's ideology.
What Stedimlija was saying then was insane to people as much as what Jevrem Brkovic is saying now. I don't care if Montenegrins are "really" Serbs or not (which is a question of both immoral and nonsensical definitions), but we cannot rewrite what happened then. To tell a Montenegrin he's not a Serb (whatever that meant) back then would be like calling Miodrag (of the Liberal Party) a Chetnik today.
Besides, the remains still "scar" the world. In the world, history of Montenegro is still treated as "became out of Serbs" in practically everywhere - from the LaRousse, Brockhaus and Britannica encyclopedias, across the CIA World Factbook to all media reporters like BBC, CNN and Times - it's even more extreme than the situation in Austria, they believe that Montenegrins are "real" Serbs. Considering how 100 years are needed to purge/change these things... who knows how will it take... --PaxEquilibrium 12:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Critika1, he denies that Montenegrins exist, calling them serbianized Croats. He always considered himself a Croat. His ideology is one of those that rocked (similar to Mile Budak, but in Montenegro) Ustashism. How on earth is he "full monte"? --PaxEquilibrium 16:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Piperi clan
[edit]He seemed to know he came from this particular group. Is it not inappropriate to call it Serb on this page if he himself had a Pan-Croat ideology? Evlekis (talk) 22:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)