Talk:Savanna Samson/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I've read through the entire article and checked every source, and I honestly can't find any major problems. This is a well-written, well-sourced article.

A good article is:

1. Well-written: Prose is good, MOS is good.
2. Factually accurate and verifiable: Sources are good, no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage: Covers main aspects, no unneeded detail.
4. Neutral: Yes.
5. Stable: Yes.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by images: Yes.

I've made a few minor CE tweaks and additions, but otherwise, that's an easy pass. — Hunter Kahn 04:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)