Talk:Saundatti

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Cities / Karnataka / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Saundatti/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This may be the only town of India, for which other than lead section only temples section exist. Isn't the Geography and demographic section needed for this? GDibyendu (talk) 17:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 05:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Vanshi:

On what basis the Rashtrakutas are classified as Surya vanshi? Are there any inscription found? i object and declare that they are chandra vanshi. There is mentions in Tholkappiam and Puranananooru abou Velirs and 18 kshatriya clans who hailed from Dwarka. Dwarka refers to city of Krishna which is itself a Kshatriya clan Vrishni yadu vanshi. So all these 18 clans must be Chandra or yadu vanshi. Cholas are also one of them. But cholas have declared they are Surya vanshi in Kanyakumari inscription, Thiruvalangadu inscription and Vikrama chola Ula. If cholas are one of velirs then why they declared surya vanshi. It is very important to mention that Dwarka as claimed wasnt mentioned as Dwarka but Thuvarai in tamil literature and that the Thuvarai was ruled by a Pandian king Irunkovel. irunkovel breaked as Irul, Ko and Vel. Irul refers to dark or black and identical with Krish in sanskrit and Ko means king and vel refers to velir. So Irunkovel may be claimed as Krishna but mentioned as Pandya king in Tamil literature. All these are mentioned in Tamil literature.