This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
In French-Canada, the Sault would be referred to as Sault-Ste.-Marie or Sault-Sainte-Marie, but this has no official status and is not used by the City. FUNgus guy18:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just a quick reminder to all editors: normally Wikipedia articles should link directly to the intended topic (i.e. Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario or Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan) rather than to the disambiguation page. In this particular case, for some articles — especially ones relating to pre-1800s history and/or the Great Lakes shipping channel — it can be quite ambiguous which SSM is the real destination topic, or even sometimes irrelevant to distinguish one from the other. In those cases it's fine to link directly here. But if your intention is to refer specifically to one city or the other, you must link directly to the actual destination article and not here. Bearcat02:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]