Talk:Saud Memon

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Pakistan: Karachi Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Karachi, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Saud Memon be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Pakistan may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Could Saud Memon have been held in Guantanamo?

The final paragraph of the article says:

According to Asra Q. Nomani, a longtime colleague of Daniel Pearl's, Pakistani papers reported that Saud Memon had been held in the United States Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba.[29] However, Saud Memon's name was not on the final official lists of Guantanamo captives, released on 15 May 2006.[30]

Well, we now know the CIA operated multiple camps at Guantanamo, when they thought it could be a "law-free zone", including Camp Strawberry Fields and Camp Penny Lane. That official list of all captives turned out to be a big lie. It only listed the captives in DoD custody. The CIA cleared all its captives from Guantanamo a few months prior to the SCOTUS ruling in Rasul v. Bush. We don't definitively know Memon wasn't held at Guantanamo prior to that.

The simplest solution would be to simply strike the second sentence. Geo Swan (talk) 17:42, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Captured by the FBI?

South African sources assert Memon was captured by the FBI. This is unlikely. It is the CIA who maintained the so-called "snatch teams". The FBI only has a domestic mandate. It would not have a mandate to operate in South Africa, without special permission. And that special permission would almost certainly have left a paper trail. Could the CIA have claimed the officials who captured Memon were FBI agent? Yes, they are shameless as to the false 55t66t5ttcovers they give their agents and officials. Geo Swan (talk) 17:42, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Saud Memon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/world/20070518-1727-pakistan-pearlslaying.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C05%5C19%5Cstory_19-5-2007_pg1_10
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/IE23Df01.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/21/world/main579223.shtml
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_19-4-2005_pg7_29
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060207035732/http://www.newsline.com.pk/NewsApr2005/newsp1apr2005.htm to http://www.newsline.com.pk/newsApr2005/newsp1apr2005.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07%2F11%2F13%2F1423246
Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/22/AR2007062201673_2.html?hpid=opinionsbox2
Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119483721533389766?mod=googlenews_wsj
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.zeenews.com/articles.asp?rep=2&aid=407137&sid=WOR&ssid=&news=Pearl%60s%20murder%20suspect%20died%20after%20interrogation:%20Report
Corrected formatting/usage for http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jm9rp7uigmyN9NiRTJYDMstRZaTw
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/may-2007/5/index3.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]