Talk:Saturday Review (U.S. magazine)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

old

"the base of several well-read critics":

I think what's meant is "widely-read," not "well-read." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.35.208.215 (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

revised to "widely-read" --P64 (talk) 18:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory claims

After reading the cited article by Greg Lindsay, I have added some more data from that source and rewritten all with in-line refs to that source. Along the way I have deleted some substantial unattributed claims that do or seem to contradict that source.

"Publication ended in 1986."

Lindsay gives 1982 and 1984 as plausible candi-dates so give both in the infobox with brief supporting quotation in the text.

"For much of its later existence, it was edited and published by Norman Cousins." "Norman Cousins, the former owner, purchased back the magazine [in 1973 or so]."

Lindsay says N.C. resigned 1971 when new owners split the magazine. If he was the 1971 seller, presumably shocked by the subsequent restructuring, that is crucial to say clearly with a reference. If he was the 1961 seller to McCall's, that needs saying. Anyway "much of its later existence" needs specification.

--P64 (talk) 18:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saturday Review (U.S. magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140107074109/http://saturday-reviewdrugtrials.com/ to http://saturday-reviewdrugtrials.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]