Talk:Saturday Evening Puss

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saturday Evening Puss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for //looney.goldenagecartoons.com/ltcuts/mgmcuts.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:17, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary too detailed

As of 17 Nov 2016, the plot summary of this article was clearly too long and detailed, being 614 words long, longer than the plot summaries in many articles about full length feature films. It had been appropriately tagged with a "story" tag since 13 Nov 2013. I removed many of the detailed scene descriptions, retaining a description of the plot, and reducing it to 205 words. On 20 Nov, IP user 81.152.221.139 greatly expanded it again, to 446 words, adding detailed scene descriptions such as changing "Mammy races back home, during which scene her face is briefly shown for the one and only time." to "Mammy is enjoying a nice game of bridge with her friends when she receives the call and is informed of a wild party taking place at her house. Furiously deducing who must be responsible, Mammy slams down the phone, excuses herself and rushes out, sending the cards flying. Mammy races back home at 90 miles an hour (briefly showing her face for the only time in the series) and is so furious she doesn't even stop to open the door, instead ripping it and it's frame right out of the wall and screeching to a halt right in front of the partying felines."

PLOTSUM says that a plot summary "should not cover every scene and every moment of a story." It says "Anything that is not necessary for a reader's understanding of these three elements [plot, character and theme] ... should not be included." It recommends that plot summaries for feature films should be 400-700 words and TV shows should be 100-200 words. A 400+ word description for a one reel cartoon is far too long and detailed, so I have reverted the change. If you feel important information is missing from the current description, please discuss it here. CodeTalker (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

reissue date

What was the date that this short was reissued (month/day/year)? It doesn't say on imdb or on the Big Cartoon Database. The first cartoon to use the blue MGM logo was Neapolitan Mouse which was made in 1953 though wasn't released till 1954. Mice Follies was the first to use the blue Tom and Jerry title card. --Evope (talk) 05:25, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]