Talk:Saskatchewan Highway 7/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Comments:

Done Try to get a map of the route for the infobox
Done Are all the intersections in the infobox considered major?
Done Do not need redundant links to Alberta Highway 9
Done Add a shield for Alberta Highway 9 to the infobox
Done In first sentence of lead, reorder it so it describes the highway from west to east
Done The sentence "Travel continues westerly on AB Highway 9" sounds awkward, rephrase
Done Clarify how Kindersley with 4,500 people "is almost at city status"
Done In phrase "Alberta Saskatchewan border" a hyphen should be added between Alberta and Saskatchewan
Done The phrase "straight stretch of road bearing east" sounds awkward
Done "north north east" should be "north-northeast"
Done "...and then is the town of Delisle." sounds awkward, rephrase
Done In sentence "Both Highway 672 east and Highway 766 east will provide access to Pike Lake Provincial Park." remove "will"
Done The last couple of sentences of the route description sound confusing and need to be clarified
Done The sentence " As well the R.M. requested to have the highway gravelled on the hills to the east and west of Flaxcombe." sounds awkward
Done "the R.M." sounds colliqual
Done Disambiguate "Interchange"
DoneRemove comma after "(but still with the city limits),"
Done Remove "a.k.a."
Done "to the Yellowhead Highway in Saskatoon's north side" soudns awkward, rephrase
Done Again, do not need redundant links to Alberta Highway 9 and also need shield for AB 9
Done Is it nessecary to indicate the kilometerposts for towns where there are no road intersections?
Done Fix alignemnt of "SK Hwy 673 east" in intersections table, it should be at the same level as the shield
Done Are the eastern termini to both sections of Highway 7 concurrecy termini? If not, remove color indicating it
Done "Alternate route through Saskatoon" should be a subheading of the "Intersections from west to east" section
Done Remove stub template as this article is not a stub

I am placing the article on hold Dough4872 (talk) 16:01, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. Thank you for reviewing this article, I believe I have covered the points mentioned above. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 02:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]