Talk:Sasha Roseneil

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women in Red: #1day1woman (2019)

This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because I do not think it is "unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view" - however, if someone highlights any particular problematic language or phrasing in the talk page I would absolutely edit and correct it. I do not see why this has led to immediate speedy deletion rather than a courteous discussion. The second point related to copyright - I have simply listed the books she has written - of course this will look similar to her list of books on her website. I have verified each book through its ISBN numbers but how can I change the titles? Please suggest to me how I can resolve this - should I list the year first, then the title, maybe take off the publisher in order to not be flagged for copyright? I find it quite unforgiving that a page that is less than 24hrs old can be flagged like this, without allowing others to contribute and improve. --Opto kitty (talk) 19:35, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because there is enough nuetral material from RS, and more RS i find by google news search, to leave an article that would meet GNG. --Rab V (talk) 21:35, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We need a picture

This is a google search of all the pictures of her with generous licences Victuallers (talk) 10:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Sasha Roseneil.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

edit request for Sasha Roseneil article

An edit request posted on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines was deleted (without taking further action), evidently because posting the request there violated Wikipedia protocol per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. The content of that request and the subsequent brief discussion can be viewed here.

Quite frankly, I could be misconstruing the issue. I have read that we are supposed to avoid biting the newcomers. I suppose some would say that the response to the original request was level-headed; perhaps this is a matter of POV. By the time I got around to adding my suggestion for a better source, almost two months had elapsed, so the original requestor had evidently thought he had done everything expected for this request to get done. I expected my suggested source would be helpful, but it seems to have been viewed as objectionable, because I should know better? Okay, well with an undue amount of effort, I have moved the request to the proper place (this page). I didn't think my input should have obligated me to actually fix anything, the suggestion itself ought to be seen as a contribution, not obligating further effort unless there is a question as to whether or not it's really an appropriate suggestion. Nevertheless, if you feel offended by this post, then please accept my apologies. Fabrickator (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]