Talk:Sarracenia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Delldot (talk · contribs) 03:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will be happy to do this review. delldot ∇. 03:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarr Cat, nice work so far, beautiful article with a very interesting subject! A few suggestions to get you started:

I would move "is a genus of carnivorous plants" to the first sentence.
There's a "dated" tag: "Flora of North America to be published in 2008". Can this be updated?
I think the lead should be exanded to include some mention of cultivation, classification, and some of the other sections. It should be a summary of the artiicle.
It's best to write in simple language and minimize jargon and specialized language (e.g. "morphophysiological characteristics"). Where unfamiliar terms can't be replaced they should be explained.
Lots more referencing needed. At the least, every paragraph after the lead should have one ref. (If one ref covers more than that, cite it repeatedly).

I think this will be a fair amount of time, so ping me when you get through referencing and implementing these and I'll have more suggestions. A good start! delldot ∇. 03:58, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it's been a couple weeks, no word from the nom. I'll fail this for now and perhaps it can be nominated again later if there's someone willing to keep working on it. delldot ∇. 03:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I got caught up with other stuff, I had planned to do more work on it, but was unable to find the time... SarrCat ∑;3 06:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, no harm done, there's always later. delldot ∇. 07:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]