This article was nominated for deletion on 4 June 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article was closed at AfD as 'no consensus' due to lack of participation at the discussion (see link above). The closer gave leave to nominate for speedy deletion, which is what I'm doing now. The coverage in the cited sources either does not support notability per WP:BAND, or are not acceptable as WP:RS. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:55, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ron Ritzman just wrote "leave to speedy renominate." NOT "leave to nominate for speedy deletion." According to WP:CSD, if a page has survived its most recent deletion discussion, it should not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations. Do you understand? --Cvlwr (talk) 07:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Saroos has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself. Also, the band has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour. --Cvlwr (talk) 07:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A7 criterion "does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion."
Also, "It is irrelevant whether the claim of notability within the article is not sufficient for the notability guidelines. If the claim is credible, the A7 tag can not be applied."
