Talk:Sarkar Raj

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Removal of "needs infobox" tag

This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB. Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sarkar Raj is actually a flop!!!

Someone with some spare time please clean up this article. Sarkar Raj is one more of RGV's disasters.

http://filmikhabar.com/2008/06/13/sarkar-raj-rgv-flop-show-continues/

http://www.naachgaana.com/2008/06/09/economic-times-sarkar-raj-rgv-flop-show-continues/

http://bollywood.celebden.com/?p=2919

google 'sarkar Raj flop', and you would know the verdict. Has RGV sent in his cybertroopers to create another cheap publicity stunt?

THE FILM WAS DISASTROUS!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.53.28.17 (talk) 14:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sarkar Raj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=312&catName=TGlmZXRpbWU=
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090725153007/http://www.cinemastrikesback.com/?p=1202 to http://www.cinemastrikesback.com/?p=1202

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]