Talk:Sarah Gadon

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

File:Sarah.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Sarah.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awards table format change

FTR, I do not like the new 'Awards' table format, and prefer the previous 'Years'-first format. There is no advantage to an 'Awards'-first table format, and I find the info much harder to parse in this format... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

assessment

@IJBall: I used Rater, and it judged the article to be a 'B'. Not sure what's missing, though, that keeps it a 'C'. Alaney2k (talk) 19:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Alaney2k: What is "Rater"? Is this some kind of script? If you've been using this for all of your assessments, I definitely find its assessments questionable at best (as it seems to be consistently "inflating" assessment ratings IMO)... In any case, 'B'-class has like 6 specific criteria that need to be met, and articles should be checked by knowledgeable editors ("by hand") before being assessed as 'B'. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Rater is a script. Then an editor reviews what it suggests and sets the values. It then does the actual edit to the file. Articles do move up from stub to start to C, etc. over time, so it is completely normal for them to change when a review is done. Pretty rare for an article to go down a level over time. Anyway, Rater provides an estimate, which I have found to be pretty good for a script. I disagree with it no more that 5% of the time, I'd say. I have been editing since 2006, I feel like I have a good general idea how to do this. Of course, I do admit I am not perfect. Alaney2k (talk) 20:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]