Talk:Sapphique

Novels: Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force.

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

i have never edited a wiki page. i'm not planning on learning now. i do think this page could use quite a bit of work. i arrived at this page because i just read the first book in the series, and i wanted to find out what happens next. unfortunately, the plot summary is barely comprehensible. run-on and incomplete sentences abound. the summary itself is not cohesive.

now i fully realize that some pages are wikipedia are of higher quality than others. obviously this is not the worst page that i've read. there's just something about this page that pushes my buttons. please edit!

disclaimer: as mentioned above, i'm not involved in the wiki editing community. i have no idea what the usual customs or rules are here. if something i have written offends or angers someone, it wasn't intentional. i have tried to be candid and polite. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.53.77.59 (talk) 08:19, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

No worries, everyone is new when they start out. One of the guiding principles of editing is to Be Bold! Go ahead and change the article to something that reads less like a grammar school book report. I'd do it, but I've never read the book in question. Hope you see this and start out on a grand Wiki adventure someday! Spaig (talk) 19:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with Realm Section + etc.

I read this book years ago and came to check about the Wikipedia articles for this series. On the Incarceron page, it says the world was stuck in the 17th century, but this page says the world is stuck in the 17th century. Which is it? I can't confirm either way, so I'll change it to match the Incarceron page so it's at the very least consistent. Also, I'll be changing the vocab and grammar of the summary to make it comprehensible., but not the meaning.

ShakurasEnder (talk) 15:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]