Talk:Santa Clara, Eugene, Oregon

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Questions, comments

Is Santa Clara really a formal CDP? Can you cite the census data? (All the CDPs that existed in 2000 have bot-created articles--I'd be surprised if they left any out.) I've always considered it a neighborhood of Eugene, though I'm not sure how much of it is w/in Eugene city boundaries right now. If it's a neighborhood, I'd like to see it moved to Santa Clara, Eugene, Oregon per naming conventions. And P.S. to Geolinks fans. There is a goal of the Geographic Coordinates WikiProject to do away with the external links that come with the Geolinks templates. You will notice the empty "External links" section. Let me know if you wish to comment on this change and I can tell you where (or just check my contribs). Thanks! Katr67 02:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It turns out...we're both right. In 1990, it was a CDP (see [1]); however the city of Eugene has annexed, or is in the process of annexing, the region (see [2] [3] [4]). I'll go ahead and make the changes. --EngineerScotty 21:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks. I was too lazy to look at a map. :) I believe the annexation is a bit contentious, but probably inevitable... Katr67 21:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]