Talk:Sanjak of Segedin

Serbia Low‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries: Ottoman Empire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire.

Names

For user Nmate:

1. If we write about modern regions, then we use their current most common names in English: in this case, such name is Bačka.
2. If we write about cities within Ottoman Empire then we use official names from this time (in this case, it is Segedin, not Szeged).
3. As for names in parenthesis, cities of Subotica, Sombor and Bač were during Ottoman rule populated by Serbs and today are part of Serbia, and I do see why you wrote Hungarian names for them. All 3 Serbian names were used during Ottoman administration. PANONIAN 16:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if we use Bačka then we use Szeged. Pls indicate a source where Ottomans are using "Szegedin". Same as Budin, the name Buda is coming from Attila times, not from Slavic Vadim/Budim. For point 3, there is still a substatial minority (some cases MAJORITY of Hungarians) so why there is no tolerance to keep Hungarian names? Does it hurt your feelings? I have tolerance for "Bačka" so do like me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdulka (talk • contribs) 12:05, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

And the question for Hobartimus: why you removed maps from the article? PANONIAN 12:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]