Talk:Sangiin Kherem

Asia: Mongols Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mongols (assessed as Low-importance).

Central Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal Sangiin Kherem is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

1.2 km length

I've added a coordinate link to the article as I was sure the empty rectangle at Khovd city North really is the fortress. It is this image in Panoramio. Both images (in Wiki and in Panoramio) show the paved street along the wall. I can not imagine any other this castle locations.

But the rectangle length is 330 m every of 4 sides. And respectively 1320 total (measurements were made in Google Earth using high resolution satellite photo). But in the article is written 1.2 km every side (not total - total would be 4.8 km). Is it possible one side value and total value were missed? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 09:44, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this the place. The figures that I found may not be exact.Your measurements should yield more accurate results. Gantuya eng (talk) 11:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the last sentence to the initial form, because it is accepted in Mongolian history to use the term "liberation" for Uliastai and Khovd. It's not conquest of foreign territory. Khatanbaatar and Magsarjav left Urga with some 200 soldiers and the main mass of the Mongolian "Army" was made up of local people. This is true liberation. Gantuya eng (talk) 03:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure the storming caused damages to the fort, but according to the original sentence (as understood by this editor) its present condition (completely empty with no trace of historical monument) is the result of 100 year "weathering" without maintenance. Gantuya eng (talk) 11:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]