Jump to content

Talk:Sangamonian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removed "Co2 glacial cycles 800k" Graph

[edit]

I removed the "Co2 glacial cycles 800k" graph from the Sangamonian (stage) article because this graph uses stratigraphic terminology that is hopelessly antiquated, obsolete, and meaningless. I discuss in the talk section for that figure. Before this graph can be used, it needs to be revised to remove the discredited Quaternary stratigraphic terminology and have it replaced with the correct Quaternary stratigraphic terminology. Paul H. (talk) 15:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of the discussion is no consensus for merge. Miniapolis 16:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about the Eemian except it's using the American name. There doesn't need to be duplication based on nomenclature.81.159.29.209 (talk) 18:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The statement that the the Eemian is just the American name is not completely correct. As noted in the article, there are two different ways of defining the Sangamonian Stage. In one definition, the Sangamonian Stage is equivalent to all of Oxygen Isotope Stage 5 and, thus, includes part of the Weichsel Glacial Stage. In the other definition, the Sangamonian Stage is defined as Oxygen Isotope Substage 5e and, thus, is equivalent to the Eemian. If anything the opening sentence for the Sangamonian Stage article needs to corrected because depending on how this term is used the Sangamonian Stage as used in North America is not always the same term as the Eemian Period. I am against merging this article because the premise for merging overlooks the different usage of Sangamonian Stage Paul H. (talk) 21:22, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another problem with merging the Sangamonian Stage with the Eemian Period is that falsely promotes the misconception / oversimplification that the North American glacial - interglacial stages are defined in the same manner as the European glacial stages which is incorrect as they are not. Both glacial - interglacial stage systems are based upon regional, not global, criteria. Thus, although they are in some ways approximately equivalent, it is incorrect and misleading to portray them as being exact time-stratigraphic equivalents as merging them falsely assumes. Paul H. (talk) 22:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sangamonian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]