Talk:Sandy Mouche

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rewrite needed!

The section dealing with the founding of the band has been lifted straight from the band's own site. I'm gonna take a shot at rewriting it, but someone with more knowledge of the band should probably step in and look it over. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.73.127.102 (talk • contribs)

Anything that is straight copy and paste should be removed, with an note placed in the edit summary when it is done as to why Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Jeepday (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--It's ok, I've rewritten the offending parts. I think it's all good now :)RicardoC (talk) 22:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC) (that was me on the first message, I wasn't logged in)[reply]

PROD

@Fourthords: I have de-prodded this article. Their most recent album got some coverage in Sydsvenskan, which is a respectable regional newspaper. A search in the Swedish newspaper archives is giving me a plenty of historical hits, some in regional and national papers as well as the expected slew of local freesheets - I'm not sure that I have access to most of the articles beyond a snippet view, though. I think that what I can see might be enough to satisfy the GNG so if the article is to be deleted it should be discussed at AFD first. I agree with you that it's currently in very poor shape; I'll do what I can to improve it if I have time later today. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 10:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]