Talk:Sandra Kanck

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: South Australia / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Sandra Kanck is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Odd...

Does anyone else find it odd that the media doesn't in any way question why federal Liberal are dead-set for censoring Kanck's comments, but why state Liberal are dead-set for the non censorship of the comments, with all 8 MLC members voting against it? http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20321880-2702,00.html is the only news article out of 39 news.google articles that actually informs readers that the Liberal MLCs voted against it... Timeshift 15:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Memory Hole

So who is going to get hold of a paper copy of Hansard, digitise the speech and email it (encrypted) to an US based Wikipedian for inclusion in Wikipedia (don't forget to cc The Memory Hole).Blaggette99 23:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done (not by me). Timeshift 13:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3 free images to choose from - which one?

Not as great as it sounds, they're all pretty dodgy, please help me make my mind up as to which to add - Choice 1 - Choice 2 - Choice 3. Timeshift (talk) 05:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd go with three, I think. Rebecca (talk) 05:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to disagree as they're all pretty average. What do you think of the edit? Timeshift (talk) 05:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it does the job as well as any of those were going to. Nice work, anyway. Rebecca (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say i'm impressed with the revert and no talk page contribution from another user. Timeshift (talk) 11:14, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I looked back and was singularly unimpressed by that triplication of boring pic(s). I'm quite surprised by Rebecca's view. The top one is no oil painting, either. Why not get on to to her hubby Aussie for a more decent one, such as is displayed on the SA Dems' website? (But one is surely enough.) She will, after all, be Australia's sole A.D. sitting parliamentarian after 30 June. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 13:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Funny how uploading an awful image inspires people to gain a better image... people on Quentin Bryce could learn a thing or two, but that's another story. This image is the best, but alas has no copyright tag. This image looks, I dunno, like she's depressed, not a good look. I'd like to use the former image, but I have suspicions over both image. Who is Arch File and how can we really know who to trust and who not to trust in terms of uploading images? Timeshift (talk) 02:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sandra Kanck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100323011535/http://www.sa.democrats.org.au:80/2009/legcoteam.htm to http://www.sa.democrats.org.au/2009/legcoteam.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:08, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]