Talk:Sandra Peabody

Sandra Peabody (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 18 June 2021 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Sandra Peabody has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 28, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Better photo?

Can't we get a better photo than the current blurry screenshot? --Muzilon (talk) 05:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography

Some of her filmography here lacks proper sources other than the unreliable IMDb. The unknown film The Horse Killer doesn't even have an IMDb page. Intriguingly, I did find a newspaper mention of a film called The Horse Killers being made around 1969 by the same crew who went on to make Little Laura and Big John. The WP article also claims she appeared in Cowards aka Love-In '72 under the alias "Susan Sparling", but the source given (Henenlotter) doesn't corroborate this.--Muzilon (talk) 00:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some of her biography is off, too. Was she born in 1952 or 1948?

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sandra Peabody/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Couldn't find any issues here.

Life and career

Early roles

The sentence ending with "an ailment" needs a source.
The sentence ending with "number of episodes" also needs a source.
Same issue with the sentence ending with "for school".
Don't forget to add year dates to each of her projects.

Collaboration with Wes Craven (1972)

First and second sentences in the first paragraph need sources (recite if necessary).
The last part of the sentence ending in "The Virgin Spring (1960)" needs a source.
Is the phrase "then scripted blonde" necessary?
The first mention of Craven in prose should be Wes Craven.
The two references after "positive reviews" don't seem reliable and go to the same link to Arrow in the Head.
The sentence ending with "funny film" needs a source (recite if necessary).
I would remove the word "extremely" as it doesn't sound Wikipedia-ish.
The sentence ending with "rape scenes" needs a source.
The second source after "throughout the shoot" doesn't seem reliable.
The words Last House should be in italics in the quote block.

Final roles

I would suggest combining the first two paragraphs since they're both kinda short.
Remove the comma after "Vinegar Syndrome".
The sentence ending in "(1973)" needs a source.
Is there a word missing in-between "when was"?
Try trimming the use of quotes in this section.
Is the description of Teenage Hitchhikers necessary.
If it is, "freedom, excitement, and independence" doesn't seem like a neutral phrase.
Move the reference from the Los Angeles Times to the end of the sentence.
Combine the last two paragraphs (too short) and find a source for the sentence ending in "assistant editor".
In this section and in others, be consistent on whether you're referring to her as "Sandra" or "Peabody".

Producer and talent agent

Try removing uses of "In [year]" as it feels repetitive and out of place.
Is the quote block about being an acting coach necessary?
"the Portland, Oregon and Los Angeles, California areas" → "areas around Portland, Oregon, and Los Angeles"

Personal life

The sentence ending in "pursued drama" needs a source.
I would suggest combining the first two paragraphs since they're related.
The last paragraph was already mentioned in the quote block so I would move it to the subsection above #Personal_life as a reason she left acting.

Filmography

Add a references column and source each of her roles/credits.
Also fill in some of her missing roles/credits.

References

Archive all archivable sources (manually or using this or this).
Mark references from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".
Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
Some references say that they are from Newspapers.com, while others don't. Try to be consistent.

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

Hey @The Baudelaire Fortune: Noticed you addressed all of my suggestions so I am passing the article's GAN. For future reference, try notifying the reviewer of the GA when you address their comments by simply pinging them (example: {{ping|Some Dude From North Carolina}} will notify me with @Some Dude From North Carolina:). Also try to add comments to the GA nomination itself, as this page was in my watchlist and any edits would have appeared in it. This helps me see your progress and will result in the article being passed sooner. Anyway, thanks for improving the page, since it's now a good article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:39, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]