Talk:San Roque, Spain

	This article is part of GibraltarpediA.GibraltarpediAWikipedia:GLAM/GibraltarpediATemplate:WikiProject GibraltarpediAGibraltarpediA-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gibraltar Mid‑importance

	Gibraltar portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gibraltar, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gibraltar and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GibraltarWikipedia:WikiProject GibraltarTemplate:WikiProject GibraltarGibraltar articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Phoenicia Low‑importance

	Phoenicia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archive 1

Archives of this discussion page Please do not change content

Edit wars

We seen to have achieved a nice article which has some genuine content and is not the Gibraltar bashing original - can we keep it that way ? I even took away the protection header to see if the vandals are asleep. Don't awaken them with propaganda. --Gibnews

I agree that the article is NPOV and I have nothing against your recent edits. Our only point of conflict, as you know, is not related to this article.--Burgas00 02:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then I suggest you leave it until that's resolved. As regards democracy, I watched it start in Spain - we had it already, and greatly enjoyed watching Tejero on TVE giving his advice to parliament. Someone gave me the CCTV footage on DVD recently. --Gibnews 09:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of Arms

I think the one shown on the page is wrong, and it should be

The crown is separate from the shield and the key faces to the right, that looks like the ones I've seen in San Roque. The one on the page although beautifully drawn is simply a steal of the current Gibraltar flag. --Gibnews (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive Detail

The article seemed to focus unduly on the details of the Gibraltar capture, which is of tangential relevance to this article. I see this as a classic example of WP:COATRACK and so I have removed excessive detail, retaining what is essential for this article. Regards, Justin talk 12:20, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on San Roque, Cádiz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]