Talk:San Marino at the 2010 Winter Olympics
Appearance
San Marino at the 2010 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 10, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:San Marino at the 2010 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 13:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Will read this article and leave comments soon. MWright96 (talk) 13:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Background
[edit]- "was chosen for the closing ceremony" - selected
Alpine skiing
[edit]- "over 23 seconds behind the lead." - leader
- "His combined time of 3 minutes and 25 seconds placed him in 80th place," - position so that reptition of similar words can be avoided
References
[edit]- Reference 2 is missing the author who wrote it and the work should be italised since it is a print publication
Not too many issues found in the article and those that are only minor ones. MWright96 (talk) 14:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, MWright96, I've addressed all these points. Courcelles (talk) 14:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: With all my points actioned, this article has now achieved GA status. MWright96 (talk) 14:15, 10 May 2018 (UTC)