Talk:San Juan Hills High School

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Schools Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Demographics

I'm curious about the 8 and 6 percent hispanic demographic numbers given in the controversy section for Dana Point and CVHS. I was all ready to be outraged, but after checking two sources, I see the numbers for CVHS above 20%.

CA DOE data and School Matters.

Where did 8 and 6 come from? Should it say a drop *of* 8 and 6, instead of *to*?

Nigel --67.102.179.30 (talk) 22:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section

I have fixed the broken citation needed tags originally added in April by user:Scottca075 [1]. I have to agree with his edit summary that this section is terrible. I'll give it a few days in case anyone wants to rewrite this in an neutral way with reliable sources. I doubt anyone will, particularly since this complaint is about events from more than a decade ago. Meters (talk)

I removed it. A sourced brief bit could be good in a history section, but I don't even see a controversy here. John from Idegon (talk) 17:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much my feeling too. Meters (talk) 02:06, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]