Talk:San Felipe, Venezuela
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Requested move 12 June 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Even though the other suggested moves are not problematic, and would fall in line with consistency, for the sake of formality, and being on the safe side, it is recommended to have a separate multi-page RM. It would also reach a larger audience. Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) 20:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
– WP:CONSISTENCY. This is the only city named "San Felipe" in Venezuela, meaning there isn't ambiguity. NoonIcarus (talk) 19:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Survey
[edit](section heading just to give a handle to add !votes in vase anyone wishes to do so) Andrewa (talk) 22:19, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support per WP:PLACEDAB. San Felipe, Guainía, San Felipe, Orange Walk, and San Felipe, Retalhuleu should also be moved for the same reason. 162 etc. (talk) 19:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support all. But maybe propose a formal multi RM for the others? Are their histories equally messy? Andrewa (talk) 22:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Previous moves
[edit]Wow, get a load of the target history:
22:01, 7 June 2022 Sesel talk contribs block m 33 bytes 0 ←Changed redirect target from San-Felipe, Yaracuy to San Felipe, Yaracuy Tags: Redirect target changed Manual revert 27 December 2021 18:09, 27 December 2021 RussBot talk contribs block m 33 bytes −8 Bot: Fixing double redirect to San-Felipe, Yaracuy undo Tags: Redirect target changed Reverted 25 December 2021 01:05, 25 December 2021 EmausBot talk contribs block m 41 bytes +6 Bot: Fixing double redirect to Saint Philip, Yaracuy State undo Tags: Redirect target changed Reverted PAWS [2.1] 23 December 2021 15:54, 23 December 2021 EmausBot talk contribs block m 35 bytes +1 Bot: Fixing double redirect to Saint Philip, Yaracuy undo Tags: Redirect target changed Reverted PAWS [2.1] 22 December 2021 18:57, 22 December 2021 EmausBot talk contribs block m 34 bytes −2 Bot: Fixing double redirect to San Felipe, Yaracuí undo Tags: Redirect target changed Reverted PAWS [2.1] 28 November 2021 01:33, 28 November 2021 Xqbot talk contribs block m 36 bytes −3 Bot: Fixing double redirect to San Felipe (Venezuela) undo Tags: Redirect target changed Reverted 23 November 2021 05:36, 23 November 2021 Xqbot talk contribs block m 39 bytes +6 Bot: Fixing double redirect to San Felipe, Yaracuy State undo Tags: Redirect target changed Reverted 4 February 2019 04:30, 4 February 2019 EmausBot talk contribs block m 33 bytes −10 Bot: Fixing double redirect to San Felipe, Yaracuy undo Tag: Redirect target changed 19 July 2018 00:05, 19 July 2018 EmausBot talk contribs block m 43 bytes +10 Bot: Fixing double redirect to San Felipe del Rey, Venezuela undo Tag: Redirect target changed 10 August 2006 16:01, 10 August 2006 Bolivian Unicyclist talk contribs block 33 bytes +33 moved San Felipe, Venezuela to San Felipe, Yaracuy
Hopefully this will lead to stability. Andrewa (talk) 22:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Jesus Christ, I had no idea. I think this is the first related discussion, so I likewise hope that it helps. --NoonIcarus (talk) 07:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- We will get there and this is a good start IMO. Interested to see what the closer does. I can't do it now as I am involved, but I think there may be a case for just doing all the relevant moves and moving on per wp:SNOW. Or we may need another formal RM to clean up the others. Andrewa (talk) 17:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.