Talk:San Diego–Tijuana/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Malleus Fatuorum (talk · contribs) 01:15, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Looks like a nice place, but the article is seriously under-cited:
- History
- Last half of first paragraph uncited.
- Geography
- Almost all of first paragraph uncited.
- Second, third, and fourth paragraphs completely uncited.
- Ecology
- Last paragraph uncited.
- Flora and fauna
- First and third paragraphs uncited.
- Currency
- Completely uncited.
- Public transportation
- First, second and fourth paragraphs uncited.
- Major highways
- Third and fourth paragraphs uncited.
- Port
- What's happened to File:EmbarcaderoBstreet.jpg?
- First paragraph uncited.
- Broadcasting
- First and fourth paragraphs are uncited.
- Sports
- "The region is known for its avid surf scene." A scene can't be avid, that's a human emotion.
- References
- There are at least 10 dead links.[1]
I'm not sure the referencing issue alone can be addressed within the span of a GA review, but I'm putting this article on hold to find out.
Given the lack of effort to address any of my concerns I am now closing this review. The work needed to get this article to meet the GA criteria is considerable. Malleus Fatuorum 00:40, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.