Talk:San Diegans for the Mt. Soledad Nat'l War Memorial v. Paulson

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the San Diegans for the Mt. Soledad Nat'l War Memorial v. Paulson redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This redirect is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Not Making the Article

I decided to redirect this to the section in the Cross's article because it is not primarily a SCOTUS case. This was an announcement of a stay, not a decision of the court. Therefore, my stub strategy will not work for it. However, the legal history of the cross probably could fill its own article. It's certainly important enough to make it into Con Law classes by default at this point. lethargilistic (talk) 17:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]