Talk:San Blas, Nayarit

Tourist Piece

This article is not badly written but it reads more like a short article from a tourist magazine or possibly from the tourist office. There is no mention of the economy, education, health, demographics etc. We don't even find out the population. Vogensen 22:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to last pre-Vogenson version, due to copyvios. - FaAfA (yap) 08:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At this time, most of this article seems to be properly written in an encyclopedic tone. However, the section on "Recreation and Tourism" still sounds like a travel brochure. It might also need some copyediting; the section reads almost as if it were translated from another language by a computer rather than a person. Oregongirl0407 (talk) 17:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently the British used San Blas as the headquarters of their fleet in these waters during the 1840s. See the article "The Paulet Affair 1843" about the unauthorized takeover of Hawaii by a British captain later overruled by the admiral headquartered at San Blas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.26.9.191 (talk) 13:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Modern History section in San Blas Nayarit

To start with the name of the resort is Limoncito Hills. Secondly, nobody deforested anything. If you need the right information just contact us. You don’t need to publish rumours instead of facts. Thank you!

Check facts.!!! 189.177.241.217 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the source, and that's the name La Jornada uses. As for the claim of deforestation, that's also in the source. Do you have any alternative source(s) that say otherwise? I can mark it as disputed, but you need to have something (unaffiliated with the project itself) to dispute it with. Paris1127 (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]