Jump to content

Talk:Samurai Jack/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Non-free rationale for the title card looks good.
  • Every genre should be sourced.
  • Running time also needs a source.
  • Was the series originally created for Adult Swim?
  • "shapshifting" → "shapeshifting"
  • "about deal the" → "about to deal the"
  • Are there several "ways" Jack can return or can it be changed to "way"?
  • Remove the comma after "critical acclaim".

Premise

[edit]
  • Add commas after "the land" and "jungles".

Episodes

[edit]
  • This section looks good.

Production

[edit]
  • Add commas after "Lawrence of Arabia" and "total, Tartakovsky".
  • The reference after "bushido code" moved to 46:44 when clicked. The timestamp is already enough so make it link to the start of the video.

Conclusion and revival

[edit]
  • Change all uses of "live action" to "live-action"
  • Add a comma after "and eventually".
  • The last two sentences in this section need sources.

Reception

[edit]

Critical reception

[edit]
  • Is the quote block necessary? Vulture doesn't seem like that much of a source for a quote block.
  • Can this section be expanded a little bit (2-5 more reviews)?

Awards and nominations

[edit]
  • Instead of skipping a line and making the text small, add in normal size "(for "[Episode]")" to the nominees (example 1 and example 2).
  • What is the purpose of the sentence at the bottom of this section? Can it be moved or removed?

Other media

[edit]
  • "released October 23" → "released on October 23"
  • Add commas after "Nintendo Switch" and "Jack, the Scotsman".

References

[edit]

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Notes

[edit]