Talk:Samsung Ultra Smart F700

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article still reads like an advert - words like 'sports' and 'boasts' aren't encyclopaedic. Reverted advert template. There are also a load of spurious marketing claims with no substantiation. "The phone boasts a 3 megapixel camera which allows for high quality picture taking." - Why does a 3MP camera allow for HQ picture taking? There's a lot more to taking pictures than the number of Megapixels. "it allows the user to control the entire handset using the touchscreen" - What does this mean? "User Interface" - why is this capitalised, and why is it's nickname relevant? What evidence is there that "across all applications" allows for the various mentioned actions to be more intuitive? I have nothing against the phone at all - but reading like an advert detracts from the legitimacy of the article. (20040302 (talk) 11:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Availability Date

This article is confusing with regard to the release/availability date. It mentions it being announced February 2007, the sidebar says it was 'available by country' February 2007. The article then says European availability started November 2007. Based on other sources I've seen it was announced Feb. 2007 and available starting December 2007.

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_f700-1849.php http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/08/samsung-outdoes-itself-with-ultra-smart-f700/ http://www.theverge.com/2011/04/20/talk-picture-samsung-f700/

Tweisbach (talk) 05:13, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non Reliable Source

Removed the claim that Samsung received a design patent in Korea as that is based on Samsung PR, reported in Business Insider, and doesn't count as a reliable source. 81.178.221.134 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Business Week is a reliable source. You can't just dismiss it because you think that the article may have been based on Samsung PR. But if you have some reliable source that disagrees with the fact that Samsung filed a Korean design patent in 2006, then please do add it. Barry McGuiness (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Advert

Availability Date

Non Reliable Source