Talk:Samrajyam

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. In addition, they should only briefly summarize the plot; detailed plot descriptions may constitute a derivative work. See Wikipedia's Copyright FAQ.

Promotional edits

An editor is trying to add WP:OR in the box office section. Adding this with a faking source. The statement is not cited in the source. Also adding that "The film was commercial success". The commercial success of a film should be attributed to its box office figures, not by "words". 117.233.154.207 (talk) 11:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information loop

DO NOT use this source from TOI (dated 31 May 2016) for citing in this article. There's a situation of Information loop here, content is copied from this version (28 May) of this article, which was poorly sourced. Some of the sentences are directly copied, such as "story of Alexander, a powerful underworld don", "blockbuster and ran for over 200 days", "twenty-one years from the original, the sequel will be telling an underworld plot with the son of Alexander". There is a chance of circular reporting in future or could have already been re-ported. From now onwards the references added to this article should subjected to scrutiny. Thanks. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 08:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]