Talk:Samantasimha (Chahamana)
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was submitted as part of the 2016 Wikipedia Asian Month. |
On 16 May 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Samantasimha to Samantasimha (Chahamana). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 16 May 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. No quorum. Any editor can revert this move per WP:RMUM. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 14:00, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
– None of the two rulers, this one and Samantasimha the guhila ruler, are exceptionally more notable than the other. These are even confused by notable historians.[1] >>> Extorc.talk 10:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ Ramvallabh Somani, 1976, History of Mewar, from Earliest Times to 1751 A.D. pg 77-79
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class India articles
- Unknown-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class Asia articles
- Unknown-importance Asia articles
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject Asia's 10,000 Challenge
- WikiProject Asia articles
- 2016 Wikipedia Asian Month Contributions