Talk:Sam Ryder

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eurovision Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Requested move 7 June 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 11:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Ryder (singer) → Sam Ryder – Clear primary topic with far more media coverage etc than a minor golfer. No need for the existing disambiguation page at Sam Ryder to be moved as the golfer can be simply linked to with a hatnote. Chessrat ^{(talk, contributions)} 18:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Less than 3 months after the article was created and he's the "clear primary topic"? Classic case of recentism. We've got a minor singer and a minor golfer. Let's leave it for a year or two and then see. Maybe the golfer is headed for great things, maybe not. Nigej (talk) 19:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Too soon - but would probably support this move if the singer gets more popularity in the future. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Sam Ryder (singer) has been famous for what, a bit over a month now? Neither article is the primary topic at this point. JIP | Talk 23:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I understand that these things are fluid but at the moment we can't circumvent WP:CRYSTAL with regards to what might be more significant or popular in the future. doktorb _words^deeds 14:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 21 May 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. — Amakuru (talk) 13:11, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Ryder (singer) → Sam Ryder – I believe that Ryder is the clear primary topic when using the "Sam Ryder" name. This was requested last year but the page had only been created within the three months prior and Ryder was only famous for being on Eurovision. He is now much more famous and well-known, and his article is now well over a year old, so I believe he is now the primary topic and his article should be renamed. Strugglehouse (talk) 17:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC as regards usage and probably as regards long-term significance. Nigej (talk) 19:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Indeed, clearly primary topic. This Sam Ryder should get priority.BabbaQ (talk) 11:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, also I can see the Sam Ryder (disambiguation) page already serves as it's task so no additional point needed. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It should be noted that less than an hour before this RM was posted, the main title header for the Sam Ryder disambiguation page had been unilaterally moved to Sam Ryder (disambiguation), thus making Sam Ryder a redirect to Sam Ryder (disambiguation). Furthermore, If there is a proposed primary Sam Ryder and one subsidiary Sam Ryder (golfer), then the Sam Ryder dab page becomes unnecessary per WP:ONEOTHER. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 07:14, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Roman Spinner Yes, this is correct. I was actually going to be WP:BOLD, and move the Sam Ryder (singer) page myself. However, since Sam Ryder was a disambiguation page, and is now a redirect, I don't have permission to move this page. Strugglehouse (talk) 07:19, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also in favour of the hatnote pointing to Sam Ryder (golfer) until another Sam Ryder gets a Wikipedia article.

Yes, only administrators can move pages to target articles which already exists. I had problems in the past in trying to bold move pages to titles which already exists. Not sure if this qualifies for a technical request though since, by checking the page history, this article has never been moved before. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 10:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An alternative option might be to move Samuel Ryder → Samuel Ryder (businessman) and then move the main title header of the Sam Ryder (disambiguation) page to Samuel Ryder since the full name of Sam Ryder (golfer) is also Samuel Ryder. Such a dab page would not have the singer as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC since he is not known as "Samuel Ryder" and users searching for his entry would access it directly by simply typing "Sam Ryder". —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be very much against moving the Samuel Ryder article. The man who donated the Ryder Cup is likely to have much more long term significance than either of the Sam Ryders. Nigej (talk) 04:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no consensus for Samuel Ryder → Samuel Ryder (businessman), paired with Samuel Ryder as the header of a potential dab page, then there is no need for a dab page, per WP:ONEOTHER. The two standalone WP:PRIMARYTOPICS — Samuel Ryder and Sam Ryder — can simply point to each other and to Sam Ryder (golfer) via hatnotes. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 15:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Nigej (talk) 17:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support as clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. –Davey2010^Talk 16:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.