Talk:Sam Quek/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bait30 (talk · contribs) 20:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be reviewing this within the next week.  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 20:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Lead

• Lead looks good to me.

Early life

• "(then) independent": should probably just be removed. I'm not sure this extra info about the school is useful in an article about Quek. Removing it would also fix a MOS:SEAOFBLUE issue. (3b)

• Amended. I also removed "in Birkenhead" after "Birkenhead High School". BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:56, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Career

• "and a few months later": I'm not sure what happened here because this is a new sentence, but it starts lowercase and with a coordinating conjunction. (1a)
• "In 2020, she was announced...": saying that she was announced makes it seem like it hasn't happened yet, but later on it says she finished as a runner up. Should be reworded to be less confusing. (1a)

• I've made those amendments. and some other small copyedits to the section. I've also changed the Celebrity Masterchef reference to one that shows she reached the final. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Personal life

• seems good to me.

Images

• Images are relevant and appropriately tagged.
• For the Quek vs Argentina photo, I would recommend mentioning that Quek is the one on the right. (6b)

• Amended the caption. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

I'm done with the prose. I will review the references very soon.  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 01:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

References

• All good.

 Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 02:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for taking on the review and for your constructive comments, Bait30. Hopefully I've addressed your points; let me know if there is anything else to be done. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Checklist so far

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: