Jump to content

Talk:Sam Adams (Oregon politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 06:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Sam Adams (Oregon politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent harassment allegations against Sam Adams

[edit]

See: http://www.portlandmercury.com/blogtown/2017/11/04/19445150/former-mayor-sam-adams-sexually-harassed-a-staffer-new-complaint-says/comments/1 , also http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/11/former_portland_employee_accus.html , http://www.wnd.com/2017/10/will-spacey-scandal-expose-gay-male-obsession-with-young-teens/ , https://www.queerty.com/congrats-kevin-spacey-conservatives-using-story-paint-gay-men-pervs-20171104 , http://www.scottlively.net/2017/11/03/hollywood-chickenhawk-scandal-part-two/ , 2601:1C2:4E02:3020:5C52:7A89:5E55:6CB2 (talk) 08:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update

[edit]

*gets popcorn ready* ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:34, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

[edit]

Per WP:LEAD a lead section should be "a summary of [an article's] most important contents." The lead section of this article is very short; recent activity in politics is certainly relevant, especially for a politician who is again seeking public office.

If anything the lead needs to be expanded.

I recently reverted an edit that had removed the second paragraph. But it's not a complete reversion, I also removed the word "revealed" which I consider an inappropriate use of the editorial voice, to lend credence to something one politician said about another. Wheeler asserted something; whether it's true or not is beyond Wikipedia's role to determine. I replaced the word "revealed" in three places. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]